View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:09 pm



Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Wiki - Reliable Source or Untrustworthly Trite? 

Wiki - good or bad?
It's Fantastic! I believe every word of it! 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
It's good, but unless something has a Reference, it's not to be trusted 77%  77%  [ 17 ]
It's ok, but most of it is just crap people make up themselves 18%  18%  [ 4 ]
It's a Hive of Scum an Villianly than only a moron would believe 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 22

 Wiki - Reliable Source or Untrustworthly Trite? 
Author Message
Humongous

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:15 pm
Posts: 1903
Location: Alberta, Canada
Age: 28
Male: Yes
Alignment: Lawful Evil
Quote: I DEMAND THINGS TO BE AWESOME! - Michel Bay
Wikipedia, the online place for all kinds of info, has been embroiled in controversy ever since its founding.

Many use it as their Bible of Information on any subject, where as others (you know who you are) have disregarded it due to the fact, and i quote, "Anyone can edit it".

While true to an extent, what most people don't know is the Wiki has a Team of Mod's, as well as numorus registered members, who maintain most articles, removing any thing with any sources to back the edit up (i am quite active on the Toku pages, and there is a User called Ryulong who keeps them very tidy and Speculation free) in a timely manner.

I think it a good place to go, but i would not trust it for Rumor's, Speculation or anything that is not already out unless it has a Reference.


Sat May 30, 2009 9:15 am
Profile
XIII
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 5284
Location: UK
Male: Yes
Favorite series: Garo
2ndFavoriteSeries: KR Faiz - Kab
Alignment: Chaotic Evil
My boom: Devil Z
its a crap source, i just hate it when people come along along and say "but wiki said it was"

wiki is not to be trusted, hell most of the rumours we hear come from there, and 99% of time they turn out to be false

_________________
Sumbit a DDL Report a broken DDL link
Do Not PM me about links, such PM's will be ignored


Sat May 30, 2009 9:58 am
Profile
Humongous

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:15 pm
Posts: 1903
Location: Alberta, Canada
Age: 28
Male: Yes
Alignment: Lawful Evil
Quote: I DEMAND THINGS TO BE AWESOME! - Michel Bay
Azazel wrote:
its a crap source, i just hate it when people come along along and say "but wiki said it was"

wiki is not to be trusted, hell most of the rumours we hear come from there, and 99% of time they turn out to be false


A Valid, if somewhat Extreme, View point.


Last edited by Deka_Hero on Sat May 30, 2009 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.



Sat May 30, 2009 10:17 am
Profile
Rising to the Top
Rising to the Top
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:29 pm
Posts: 5811
If wiki was a reliable source, then why it can't be used for doing papers or in some cases, evidence for court cases?

Nuff said.

_________________
Image


Sat May 30, 2009 10:19 am
Profile
XIII
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 5284
Location: UK
Male: Yes
Favorite series: Garo
2ndFavoriteSeries: KR Faiz - Kab
Alignment: Chaotic Evil
My boom: Devil Z
and over here in the UK, wiki is a banded source for all academic papers, one sniff of it and you are heavily penalised, i have seen it happen (not to me thou)

_________________
Sumbit a DDL Report a broken DDL link
Do Not PM me about links, such PM's will be ignored


Sat May 30, 2009 11:09 am
Profile
Humongous

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:15 pm
Posts: 1903
Location: Alberta, Canada
Age: 28
Male: Yes
Alignment: Lawful Evil
Quote: I DEMAND THINGS TO BE AWESOME! - Michel Bay
Azazel wrote:
and over here in the UK, wiki is a banded source for all academic papers, one sniff of it and you are heavily penalised, i have seen it happen (not to me thou)


Yeah, ive heard about it.
Some Universities here in Canada, its grounds for Failing that Year.


Sat May 30, 2009 11:26 am
Profile
Number 6
Number 6
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 11:07 am
Posts: 6
Location: Philippines
Favorite series: Puzzle
2ndFavoriteSeries: Garo
Dreamy: Saki Royama
Alignment: Neutral Good
My boom: Planes
Wiki is good enough for some light reading and a significant portion of the material is quite accurate. However, there are better sources out there. If you want to be taken seriously, don't cite wiki.


Sat May 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Profile
Save the life
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:01 pm
Posts: 1527
Age: 21
Male: Yes
omg are u a girl?: Yes
Favorite Actor?: Nobuyuki Hiyama
not much of a good source, but i do use it for shits and giggles

_________________
Twitter
iamawesome.com


Sat May 30, 2009 12:33 pm
Profile
Team Baron
Team Baron
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:33 pm
Posts: 20686
Location: Yami ni umare, yami ni kisu
Male: Yes
Favorite series: All of them
Alignment: Neutral
My boom: stick
Quote: "Are you the new monarch, or are you just a pawn of fate?" - Emerald Herald
Type: ISFJ Protector
It's neither of those two things. One would be foolhardy to argue either points outside of a joking context

It's fine if people use it, but as in all things, know where the source of the information is and decide if that information seems reasonable

_________________
http://takkynoko.tumblr.com/ My new blog
Image
My Profile on our Wiki Things I do


Sat May 30, 2009 12:35 pm
Profile WWW
Robo's Birthday
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:22 am
Posts: 534
Age: 33
Male: Yes
Favorite series: Hibiki
2ndFavoriteSeries: Den-O
Alignment: Neutral Good
My boom: JRPGs
I voted that it's okay but a lot of it is crap people make up.

If you go to an entry on say, George Washington, most of the information is probably going to be mostly reliable, unless someone vandalized it recently to say something like "George Washington weighed exactly one ton and was thirty stories tall and made of radiation."

Interesting fact, by the way. The wikipedia entry for Optimus Prime is longer than the entry for George Washington.

Anyway I wouldn't use it for stuff like, say, information on currently ongoing TV series or anything, or a reliable source for information on the effects of psychological studies. But if I wanna know what year Money For Nothing was released, it's fine.

_________________
Image


Sat May 30, 2009 4:40 pm
Profile
Imouto Rider Club
Imouto Rider Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:50 am
Posts: 803
Location: Philippines
Age: 28
Male: Yes
Favorite series: KS7, Ultraman, KR
2ndFavoriteSeries: Super Sentai Series
Dreamy: Yumi Sugimoto
Favorite Band: Orange Range
Alignment: Neutral Good
My boom: mouse-clicking
Yes, I think too that it's somewhere in between. It is hardly enough to be reliable as anyone can just make his own version of the fact. Though I think the editor's were trying their best to keep the content clean, but the enormous amount of articles is just as hard to monitor. Wikipedia lives in a notion of how honest and reliable of the people of the world are. Unfortunately, we don't live in such euphoria to make wiki reliable. [citation needed]

Wikipedia was at least a good idea to start with, only if they create a better system for contributors and editors. It would be nice if wiki has an AI that could self-critic it's own content.

_________________
Image


Sat May 30, 2009 5:35 pm
Profile
Hyakkiyakou wo Buttagiru

Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:09 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Under the radar...
Age: 32
Male: Yes
Favorite series: Kamen Rider Agito
2ndFavoriteSeries: Kamen Rider BLACK
Dreamy: Kazashiro Miu
Alignment: Chaotic Good
My boom: everything...
How many stuff are trustworthy and reliable in the internet anyway? Even when you use google, you'll get loads of crap thrown at you. You'll always have to multiple check every info you get. Wikipedia articles that has reference or links can be a good start. It may not very reliable itself, but it can point to the right direction (even wrong ones as well). So, it totally unqualifies as academic reference, but you can't totally rule it out as well.

IMHO, it's up to the ones 'in the know' or has actual valid sources to provide the correct info, since 'anyone can edit' it. rather than let it be edited by those who 'thinks' they know stuff.


Sun May 31, 2009 10:24 am
Profile
Kamen Knight
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:21 pm
Posts: 322
Location: Australia
Age: 29
Male: Yes
Favorite Band: High n' Mighty Color
StagBeetle wrote:
Wikipedia articles that has reference or links can be a good start. It may not very reliable itself, but it can point to the right direction (even wrong ones as well). So, it totally unqualifies as academic reference, but you can't totally rule it out as well.


I agree, when seriously researching something, its a good starting point. When Im researching something I use wiki to get very basic info and ideas, then check out it references. I would then do my own research from there.
Its articles on things certain topics are also more reliable than other IMO. I study computer science in university and I find that its articles on things involving mathematics and computing not to bad, I guess things like that isnt really open to interpretation and I doubt most ppl dont visit them so less likely of being vandilized.

_________________
I can dance too!
Image


Sun May 31, 2009 6:38 pm
Profile
Kamen Knight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:49 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: NC
Age: 27
Male: Yes
Favorite series: KR W & Gaim
2ndFavoriteSeries: Keitei Sousakan 7
Dreamy: Why yes I am
Favorite Actor?: Watanabe Hiroyuki
Favorite Band: Royksopp
Alignment: Chaotic Good
My boom: Film Noir
Quote: "Walking the path of Hell, the man who serves no one."
If I use Wikipedia, I look for where they get their information and if it's valid. I've used Wikipedia for research papers, but not directly. I'll search for a subject on there, then go to the bottom of the page and check out the resources used there, then go to them for information.

_________________
ImageImage


Sun May 31, 2009 8:10 pm
Profile WWW
Kamen Knight
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1214
Location: Hell
Age: 27
omg are u a girl?: Yes
Favorite series: Kamen Rider Kabuto
2ndFavoriteSeries: Fuuma no Kojirou
Dreamy: Yaguruma Sou
Favorite Actor?: Sato Tomohito
Alignment: Chaotic Good
I think wikipedia is good for looking things up quickly. For example, if you don't know what something is, you can wiki it. Or, perhaps, if you get a random curiosity about something, you can look it up on wikipedia.

However, I certainly wouldn't use it for school work. And if I wanted in depth information about something, I'd probably search the university database or go to the library. All in all, though, I think wiki is a decent resource, but it also depends heavily upon what you're trying to find out about....

_________________
Image

Image


Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:01 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.