Azazel wrote:ACC uses 5.1 streams, so yet another flaw in your argument
another is you seem to think we are an anime fansub group, which we arnt
Another thing you seem to assume is that people want to turn subs off, which is daft, why download a fansub if your just gonna turn the subs off
You also have to remember not everyone is computer savey, so they might not understand how to play a video with softsubs, which is why they like hardsubs
MP4 is the ideal choice as it is more generic and not so resource intensive, not to mention its an industry standard developed my by the Moving Picture Experts Group and is also an ISO standard, where as mkv isnt
another fail on your part is you used wikipedia to back up your argument, wiki is just a dumb source created by idiots who think they know stuff when they dont, also according to that article MP4 supports AC3, so uber FAIL on your part for yet again not reading shit up
Why do you use so many insults?
I mean, I'm really trying to be civil here.
Anyways, I'm not trying to insinuate T-N as an anime sub group, I'm just here to discuss the uses of mkv container format compared to avi container format.
The reason why people use softsubs is random, maybe they wanna try listening to the Japanese without subs, maybe they wan't to take clean pictures, whatever the reason, the fact still stands that .AVI do not support softsubs while .MKV do. Softsubs also allow people to edit the script if there are any errors or maybe some things they didn't like (For example, people who doesn't like some japanese words left untranslated). Other softsub's advantages can be found on my first post.
You don't have to be computer savvy to watch softsubs in .mkv, since the subs is already in the container format, it automatically generated. Provided you have a decent computer and the right player.
I understand how wikipedia isn't a reliable source for facts, but it's not always 100% off.
It is a fact that matroska (MKV) supports many of the more advanced features that modern audio and video compression formats will offer, such as Variable Bitrate audio encoding ( VBR ), or Variable Framerate video encoding ( VFR ). Although AVI was extended with an additional standard called 'Open DML AVI' in the mid/late 90s, overcoming most of its very annoying limitations like the 2 GB file size limit, there is still no proper and spec compliant way to support modern compression formats like the excellent, opensource Ogg Vorbis audio compression format.
matroska is overcoming all these limitations and can support all known audio and video compression formats by design. To make sure it will also be capable of coping with the future standards it is based on a very flexible underlying framework called EBML, allowing to add more functionalities to the container format without breaking backwards compatibility with older software and files.
VfW(Video for windows)/AVI is not suited to new-ish compression (including XviD), for H.264 it's even worse since it's possible to reference more frames, keep some B-frames as references, use mixed references etc.
Understand why I compared MKV H264 and AVI Xvid to DVD and VCD?
Azazel wrote:pekcun wrote:
People who has problems with .mkv might just need a better player or maybe a better computer.
just spotted this while reading back thru, not everybody can afford a PC upgrade these days, so you fail yet again for assuming everybody has the ability to upgrade their pc
All your arguments fail to impress and make you look like such a dork,
pekcun wrote:You don't need to download any fonts, you just need the right codecs,
FAIL of the highest order for that one
/me awaits the stupid response from some who fails so much
About the "get a better PC" I was just being a douche, that's not exactly my argument. But it's not like playing mkv demands you to have a supercomputer or something. You just need a decent computer and the latest DirectShow parser filter, that way you will be able to play your .mkv files on Microsoft Windows with every DirectShow based player such as Windows Mediaplayer (6.4/7/8/9), Zoomplayer and BSplayer. The best playback support from Windows is currently achieved with The Core Media Player, if the matroska CDL plugin was used.
For Linux PCs, as well as for MacOSX and the X-Box emulation you have to get the newest version of mplayer, and make sure to have a compilation that will include libebml and libmatroska. Suitable RPMs are available from Mosu's mkvtoolnix site.
And if some people has a low-end computer, maybe they could visit CCCP's support section and find codecs that might help them.
And yes, I failed on that font thing.
Basically, I'm just saying that the reason why .mkv > .avi is because it's newer, supports H264 (avi supports it too but with hacks, while mkv supports h264 natively), supports multiple soft subs (optionally putting different languages, different fonts, turning it off, turning it on), supports chapters, etc.
AVI do not support the following: multi channel audio, multiple audio streams, subtitles (in DVDs they're hard subtitles - text can't be positioned and/or resized), more than 2GB file size.
Let's face it, avi was made in '92, it's getting rather old. Though the fact that it's so old and common makes people more familiar with it.
It works, true, but that doesn't exactly make it good.
I was just thinking maybe T-N could consider using H264 mkv for their releases, I'm not asking, it's just a suggestion, really.
The obvious upside would be smaller filesizes with good/better quality, avi does not natively support H264, which is why people use mkv.